The
Reason is Visibility
The
focus of effective hunting has been visibility for decades. Naturally,
that is the reason for scopes, binoculars, and spotters. The debates
over the "better" scopes and binoculars seem endless, but
if they were not considered vitally important hunting equipment there
would be no particular reason to debate about them at all. We all seek
to know exactly what we are shooting at, and how far we are shooting
at our game-the reason that laser rangefinders, yet another optic accessory
are now considered vital equipment for many hunters around the world.
We also seek the
most accurate, most terminally effective hunting projectiles-- projectiles
that were not made, and could not have been made back in the day. The
vast majority of muzzleloading enthusiasts are not using blackpowder
at all-- instead, more energetic synthetic propellants like perchlorate
enhanced Pyrodex or di-nitro hopped-up Triple Se7en are standard fare.
Muzzleloading rifles, regardless of brand, are made on equipment that
simply did not exist even a few decades ago. Modern manufacturing mass-production
techniques are applied in varying degrees to all popular muzzleloaders
made today.
No 209 fired inline
is designed around blackpowder at all-- the necessity for the 209 battery
cup anvil primers is present in Triple Se7en pellets, where "for
209 use only" is clearly stated. Of course, a quick look at pellets
reveals that they are not powder at all-molded cylinders that you might
expect to find as an Estes model rocket engine. Most inlines are designed
around pellet use; certainly all "magnum" touted inlines are.
Though Hodgdon only allows use of two pellets in .50 caliber inlines,
it is hard to find a popular model that does not recommend three. Some
makers recommend more. No disillusions of role-playing persist: it is
modern equipment and modern propellants across the industry and across
the country. The public record adamantly shows this beyond dispute.
Yet, the severe
limitations of being handloaders in the field, with only one shot remain.
The one shot, by virtue of being loaded from the muzzle, has finite
limitations. With hand power loading only, we are left with soft polymers
and poor flying, large caliber projectiles. No matter what the brand
or make of muzzleloader, a second shot at a running animal is unlikely,
and the basic exterior ballistics of large caliber projectiles limit
what can be done.
An aversion to
technology would be specious; as this article is likely being read over
the internet. Everything we do when we hunt seeks to be as effective
as possible. Trailcams, ATV's, scouting, and glassing are all examples
of where we utilize the best equipment available. We do not always make
our own boots, gloves, blinds, walkie-talkies, treestands, much less
our own GPS units. We certainly don't head to the hunting woods by foot
or horseback for the most part; invariably a horseless carriage is involved.
In fact, even our hunting tags are often ordered over the Internet.
After all of this
embracing of new technology, and working to both better and maintain
our visual equipment in the field-- it certainly seems a bit duplicitous
to destroy it. Yet, every time we fill the air with caustic smoke we
can deposit caustic residue on our equipment. Our scopes don't work
as well with a film of residue; there is no glory in taking more time
to clean your equipment than your deer, and to lose an animal after
the shot due to thick fog we produced in dense cover seems self-defeating.
It doesn't happen all the time, of course-- but happen it does.
The
over one century old approach of not filling the air with toxic, corrosive
smoke that destroys visibility and equipment alike was a good one a
hundred years ago-- and it makes all the sense in the world right now.
©
October, 2005 by Randy Wakeman